A common workplace complaint is there are too many meetings. I believe employees are really saying there are too many meetings that are boring and not worth their time. When participants say a meeting was great, usually, it was because they participated in making decisions or problem solving. When attendees believe their participation was appreciated and used they feel the meeting was worthwhile.
My view is meetings should accomplish three goals:
- Make decisions or solve problems
- Assign tasks as a result of those actions
- Make participants feel part of a team
Exceptions include staff meetings informing employees of organizational business or performance evaluations.
Meetings need careful planning and have a written, prioritized agenda. The agenda should:
- List the topics for discussion with a time estimate for each. Time limitations should be honored with flexibility for longer-than-expected discussion of priority items.
- List topics to be discussed in priority order using a system such as:
- X - Urgent topics to be completed at this meeting;
- A - High priority items for which every effort should be made to complete;
- B - Medium priority items for completion if possible;
- C - Low priority items discussed only if time is left over.
Written materials are needed for making decisions or problem solving they should be distributed along with the agenda before the meeting. Attendees can then read, digest and assimilate the materials and ask clarifying questions. Participants should be given the same opportunity to prepare as the meeting organizer. Never wait until the meeting time to distribute materials essential for understanding the upcoming discussion. Most importantly, the distribution is an invitation for attendees to become informed, active participants. I suggest that only participants having read the distributed material be allowed to participate in the discussion. This is a courtesy to those who prepared. Moreover this sends a pointed message to the staff that informed participation is wanted and is achieved only with the required effort.
Meeting leaders should limit their own participation. For many years I led a business relationships seminar at a local university. I find when I intervene with my ideas participation stops in deference to me. It is best when participants express their thoughts and not depend on me. My most productive sessions occur when my participation is limited. The role of the meeting leader is as the title suggests. It is to lead and guide the discussion, not dominate it. He or she should interject primarily when discussion is lagging, moving off topic or overlooking something vital.
It is through meetings that superiors and their staffs have the most frequent contact. It becomes especially important certain rules be inviolate. These rules relate both to the superior and staff.
- The superior must never be late. Being late sends a strong negative message to subordinates. It says their work and time are not valued. A leader cannot expect attendees to treat his time as valuable if he does not have a similar regard for their time.
- Meetings should begin and end promptly at the designated time. Like their bosses, the staff has schedules and commitments to keep. They cannot do so if a meeting scheduled for 1 hour lasts two or more. Allowing this to happen shows a gross disregard and disrespect for their time.
- Always start a meeting by reminding everyone to turn off cell phones, Blackberries and pagers. No one should accept calls during a meeting. Although it may seem important to take a call, it is rude and insensitive to others. If you are expecting an important call, ask the caller to reach you at a certain time, not during the meeting.
- A meeting organizer should ask for a critique of the process at the end of each meeting. When a meeting does not go well, this may be difficult for fear of receiving negative feedback. Your critics are your best friends when aspiring to achieve legendary performance.
- Don’t perform another task while attending a meeting. I recently worked with Mark who was one of the most talented people in the construction industry. He was a department head in a very large construction company. He had a wonderful understanding of the business. His projects were flawless and he successfully marketed his department. But when attending meetings he would check his mail and e-mails. The resentment of his peers and superior was palpable. Eventually he was fired. His meeting behavior was not the only cause for his dismissal but it contributed.
Unfortunately, I learned this lesson myself when attending a meeting as a board member of a health club company. There was no advance distribution of the important financial information. The performance numbers were projected in a dark room and were almost illegible. I was getting sleepy. So I began to do other work wrongly assuming no one would notice I wasn’t paying attention. I was wrong. After the meeting, the Chief Operating Officer let me know he was disappointed I wasn’t paying attention to his presentation.
PowerPoint presentations can be boring to the point of being lethal. If PowerPoint is required, the presenter should try to enliven the content. He shouldn’t just read the bullet points on the screen. Those points can be brought to life through back-up materials and stories. I know of one speaker who enlivens his PowerPoint presentations by asking questions during the display. He gives small prizes for correct answers. This may sound juvenile but I have seen it work wonders in a group.
If a presentation requires a map or other illustration, check that the audience can understand it. My graduate degree is in law but I always wished I attended a college emphasizing the humanities. I wanted to study great literature and visited a college having such a program. I sat in on a lecture to evaluate their graduate program. The lecturer had an extensive set of notes and accompanying maps. To my amazement she simply read from her notes, took no questions and the maps were too small to follow. Along with a number of others I quickly became bored and left after the first break. I tried to convince myself to try another lecture, but that one lecture had an indelible effect. My interest in that college ended early.
Yet another example illustrates the dangers inherent in PowerPoint presentations. I went with a client to a presentation by a software vendor. My client’s company wanted to buy the new software package. The presenter started by distributing a poorly drafted memo. Then while everyone started to read it the salesman began his PowerPoint presentation. No one knew whether to listen to him or read the memo. The print used in the PowerPoint presentation was too small to be read. After a half hour the presenter was informed we were running out of time. But he would not be deterred. He continued a strong sales pitch the client didn’t want to hear. An assured sale was in jeopardy because the potential buyer wasn’t sure he could work with such an insensitive vendor. At least three important rules for conducting a meeting had been violated: 1) Lack of sensitivity to the expressed needs, desires and time limitations of the participants; 2) Failure to ensure the PowerPoint presentation would be read and understood; 3) Not providing in advance written materials needed for the discussion.
Principle Two Summary
Before the Meeting:
- Meetings should be carefully planned with a written agenda prepared and distributed early enough before a meeting to permit it to be read by participants.
- Agendas should list topics to be discussed, relative priority and the time allotted for discussion of each topic.
- All written materials to be considered should also be distributed well before the meeting.
- No one, including the leader, should be late for a meeting.
- The meeting leader should carefully limit his active participation. His proper role is to moderate, lead and control the discussion.
- Meetings should begin and end at the designated time.
- Participants should be asked to critique meetings.
- Do not perform other tasks during a meeting.
- A PowerPoint presenter reading from the screen is the lazy approach and lethal for attendees. The presenter must be certain the content on the screen is clear and readable.